Keyword summary
0% 8 analyzed articles/videos 7,979 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dark Money results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 5,679 hits . Analysis detected 35,775 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,891 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,645 of 37,536 keywords). This Dark Money is better (less manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group. Dark Money
Keyword details
Total words: 36,891
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score8 analyzed articles36.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst