Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,114 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jahd Khalil results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 929 hits . Analysis detected 6,503 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,399 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,604 of 6,628 authors). This Jahd Khalil is better (less manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group. Jahd Khalil
Author details
Total words: 7,399
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.8% 11.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Tu Quoque: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst