Keyword summary
64% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,043 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dario Amodei results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 958 hits . Analysis detected 11,065 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,458 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,443 of 36,707 keywords). This Dario Amodei is better (less manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group. Dario Amodei
Keyword details
Total words: 10,458
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.1% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst