Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,697 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Danielle Smith results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Anecdotal , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 853 hits . Analysis detected 8,101 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,288 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (28,886 of 36,076 keywords). This Danielle Smith is better (less manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group. Danielle Smith
Keyword details
Total words: 10,288
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst