Keyword summary
9% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,987 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Patrick results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 1,738 hits . Analysis detected 7,702 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,488 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (31,955 of 34,832 keywords). This Dan Patrick is better (less manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group. Dan Patrick
Keyword details
Total words: 13,488
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.3% percentile 1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst