Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video564 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daily Beast Podcasts results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.8% saturation with 605 hits. Analysis detected 3,532 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,256 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 83% (6,428 of 37,536 keywords). This Daily Beast Podcasts is worse (more manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group.
Daily Beast Podcasts
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
83%Daily Beast Podcasts (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,256
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

83% percentile
025507510082.9% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 16.2%16.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 26.8%26.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 12.9%12.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 26.8%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Horn Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos