Keyword summary
78% 1 analyzed article/video 1,818 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cynicism results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 29.2% saturation with 2,122 hits . Analysis detected 9,408 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,272 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (13,216 of 37,536 keywords). This Cynicism is worse (more manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group. Cynicism
Keyword details
Total words: 7,272
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.8% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 29.2% 29.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.8% 17.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 29.2%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Composition/Division: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst