Keyword summary
39% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,270 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cyclospora Cayetanensis results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 1,292 hits . Analysis detected 9,379 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,531 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (27,889 of 37,536 keywords). This Cyclospora Cayetanensis is better (less manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group. Cyclospora Cayetanensis
Keyword details
Total words: 11,531
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst