Keyword summary
⁠64%2 analyzed articles/videos743 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cyberattack Minnesota Water Systems results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 306 hits. Analysis detected 2,414 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,972 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (20,634 of 58,610 keywords). This Cyberattack Minnesota Water Systems is worse (more manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group.
Cyberattack Minnesota Water Systems
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,972
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

65% percentile
025507510064.8% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos