Keyword summary
52% 2 analyzed articles/videos 642 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Culinary results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 1,053 hits . Analysis detected 4,955 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,256 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 67% (11,586 of 34,833 keywords). This Culinary is worse (more manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group. Culinary
Keyword details
Total words: 5,256
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.7% percentile 3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.6% 19.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 20.0% 20.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 20.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst