Keyword summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 4,157 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crown Center results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 1,824 hits . Analysis detected 13,129 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,065 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (32,051 of 34,043 keywords). This Crown Center is better (less manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group. Crown Center
Keyword details
Total words: 22,065
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles22.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst