Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,398 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crossroads results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Self-Serving Bias , and Halo Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 1,569 hits . Analysis detected 6,061 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,592 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 16% (31,519 of 37,536 keywords). This Crossroads is better (less manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group. Crossroads
Keyword details
Total words: 9,592
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 16.4% 16.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst