Keyword summary
30% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,101 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Costa Mesa results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 1,403 hits . Analysis detected 10,138 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,111 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (26,506 of 35,718 keywords). This Costa Mesa is better (less manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group. Costa Mesa
Keyword details
Total words: 13,111
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst