Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,073 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumer Services results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Biased Writer Voice, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 446 hits. Analysis detected 1,958 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,575 of 37,536 keywords). This Consumer Services is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Consumer Services
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
24%Consumer Services (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,292
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

24% percentile
025507510023.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos