Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,232 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consent Of The Governed results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Confirmation Bias, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 997 hits. Analysis detected 9,214 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,928 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (23,375 of 37,536 keywords). This Consent Of The Governed is better (less manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Consent Of The Governed
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
38%Consent Of The Governed (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,928
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

38% percentile
025507510037.7% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos