Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Conscientious Objector results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 1,473 hits. Analysis detected 10,604 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,620 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Conscientious Objector is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Conscientious Objector
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Conscientious Objector (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,620
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 13.9%13.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos