Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,159 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Negotiations results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and False Dilemma, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 663 hits. Analysis detected 4,660 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,636 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (17,251 of 37,536 keywords). This Congressional Negotiations is worse (more manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
Congressional Negotiations
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,636
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

54% percentile
025507510054.0% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos