Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 4,098 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Maps results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 2,010 hits . Analysis detected 12,675 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,412 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (25,129 of 37,536 keywords). This Congressional Maps is better (less manipulative) than 66.90% of the peer group. Congressional Maps
Keyword details
Total words: 13,412
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.1% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst