Keyword summary
⁠33%2 analyzed articles/videos497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Hispanic Caucus results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 213 hits. Analysis detected 1,269 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,920 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (18,771 of 37,536 keywords). This Congressional Hispanic Caucus is worse (more manipulative) than 50.00% of the peer group.
Congressional Hispanic Caucus
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,920
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

50% percentile
025507510050.0% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.1%11.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.6%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Horn Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos