Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video484 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Action results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 422 hits. Analysis detected 3,203 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,439 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of 89% (4,370 of 37,536 keywords). This Congressional Action is worse (more manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group.
Congressional Action
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
89%Congressional Action (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,439
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

88% percentile
025507510088.4% percentile
6.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 15.8%15.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 5.3%5.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 29.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 18.8%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Horn Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.0%Straw Man: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos