Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,479 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congress Oversight results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 37.8% saturation with 1,676 hits . Analysis detected 11,801 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,437 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of 92% (3,174 of 37,536 keywords). This Congress Oversight is worse (more manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group. Congress Oversight
Keyword details
Total words: 4,437
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.5% percentile 7.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 37.8% 37.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 21.4% 21.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 29.8% 29.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 37.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 29.8%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Keyword 22.8%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 21.4%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 3.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Horn Effect: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 1.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 6.0% Straw Man: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 0.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst