Keyword summary
â 46% 4 analyzed articles/videos 547 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Confrontation results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 899 hits . Analysis detected 7,630 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,002 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of â 31% (26,216 of 37,536 keywords). This Confrontation is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group. Confrontation
Keyword details
Total words: 8,002
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst