Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 459 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Condoms results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Negativity Bias , and Bandwagon , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 223 hits . Analysis detected 1,965 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 74% (9,835 of 37,536 keywords). This Condoms is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group. Condoms
Keyword details
Total words: 1,836
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.8% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Red Herring: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 0.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Primacy Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Tu Quoque: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst