Keyword summary
72% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,750 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Compounded Drugs results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 1,308 hits . Analysis detected 8,521 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,101 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (13,287 of 37,536 keywords). This Compounded Drugs is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group. Compounded Drugs
Keyword details
Total words: 6,101
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.6% percentile 3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst