Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,973 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Watch results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.8% saturation with 2,746 hits. Analysis detected 9,464 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,919 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (9,228 of 37,536 keywords). This Community Watch is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
Community Watch
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
76%Community Watch (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,919
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

75% percentile
025507510075.4% percentile
4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 30.8%30.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.0%0.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 30.4%30.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 30.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 30.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos