Keyword summary
⁠41%4 analyzed articles/videos1,738 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Commodity Futures Trading Commission results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 506 hits. Analysis detected 4,721 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,544 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (48,789 of 54,846 keywords). This Commodity Futures Trading Commission is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 9,544
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

11% percentile
025507510011.0% percentile
1.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos