Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,290 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Columbia Missouri results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Loss Aversion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 1,047 hits . Analysis detected 3,989 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,870 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (13,440 of 37,536 keywords). This Columbia Missouri is worse (more manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group. Columbia Missouri
Keyword details
Total words: 3,870
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.2% percentile 3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 27.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst