Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,801 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Addison Zanger results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Loss Aversion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 1,243 hits . Analysis detected 4,872 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,298 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,345 of 6,628 authors). This Addison Zanger is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group. Addison Zanger
Author details
Total words: 6,298
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.5% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 5.9% 5.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.5% 3.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst