Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video384 analyzed words
BS Summary: These E.V. Beyers results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 59.5% saturation with 685 hits. Analysis detected 1,869 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,152 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.8% and a BS Rank of 96% (303 of 6,529 authors). This E.V. Beyers is worse (more manipulative) than 95.40% of the peer group.
E.V. Beyers
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
96%E.V. Beyers (selected)11%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,152
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

95% percentile
025507510095.4% percentile
10.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 59.5%59.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 30.1%30.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.6%5.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.1%9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 22.6%22.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.7%3.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 4.3%4.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Author 59.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 30.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Author 22.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 10.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos