Keyword summary
28% 6 analyzed articles/videos 4,720 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Colorado Wildfires results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 1,384 hits . Analysis detected 7,351 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,353 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (36,479 of 37,536 keywords). This Colorado Wildfires is better (less manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group. Colorado Wildfires
Keyword details
Total words: 18,353
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.8% percentile 1.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles18.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst