Keyword summary
65%3 analyzed articles/videos2,448 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coachella Valley results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 1,768 hits. Analysis detected 12,047 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,109 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (16,745 of 37,536 keywords). This Coachella Valley is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Coachella Valley
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
56%Coachella Valley (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,109
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

55% percentile
025507510055.4% percentile
3.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.6%13.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 12.5%12.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate