Keyword summary
96% 1 analyzed article/video 508 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clutter results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 248 hits . Analysis detected 1,926 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,524 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (10,079 of 37,196 keywords). This Clutter is worse (more manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group. Clutter
Keyword details
Total words: 1,524
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.9% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 16.3% 16.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.5% 14.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.9% 14.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Middle Ground: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst