Keyword summary
44%2 analyzed articles/videos1,841 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climate Policies results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 487 hits. Analysis detected 5,960 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,389 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (26,182 of 37,536 keywords). This Climate Policies is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
Climate Policies
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
31%Climate Policies (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,389
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

30% percentile
025507510030.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.6%7.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos