Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos804 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climate Goals results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 516 hits. Analysis detected 3,787 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,952 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 74% (9,857 of 37,536 keywords). This Climate Goals is worse (more manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group.
Climate Goals
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
74%Climate Goals (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,952
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

74% percentile
025507510073.7% percentile
4.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.5%17.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.3%14.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 12.8%12.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 4.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate