Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Climate Change Alarmism results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31% saturation with 787 hits . Analysis detected 4,600 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,535 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Climate Change Alarmism is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Climate Change Alarmism
Keyword details
Total words: 2,535
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 25.4% 25.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 31.1% 31.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.0% 17.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 31.1%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 25.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Tu Quoque: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.0% Red Herring: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.4% Special Pleading: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst