Keyword summary
56% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,865 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Class Action Lawsuit results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 2,171 hits . Analysis detected 16,514 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,788 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,703 of 37,536 keywords). This Class Action Lawsuit is better (less manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group. Class Action Lawsuit
Keyword details
Total words: 17,788
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles17.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst