Keyword summary
60% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,778 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Civilian Harm results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 2,302 hits . Analysis detected 18,304 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,886 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,605 of 37,536 keywords). This Civilian Harm is better (less manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group. Civilian Harm
Keyword details
Total words: 16,886
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles16.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst