Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,663 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lt. Col. Rachel E. VanLandingham (ret.) results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Indoctrination , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 2,088 hits . Analysis detected 12,656 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,748 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,538 of 6,360 authors). This Lt. Col. Rachel E. VanLandingham (ret.) is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group. Lt. Col. Rachel E. VanLandingham (ret.)
Author details
Total words: 8,748
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.1% percentile 3.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 23.9% 23.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 12.4% 12.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.0%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 12.4%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Tu Quoque: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst