Keyword summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video1,141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Civil Rights Complaint results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 741 hits. Analysis detected 3,875 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,564 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (14,054 of 50,018 keywords). This Civil Rights Complaint is worse (more manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group.
Civil Rights Complaint
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠72%Civil Rights Complaint (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,564
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

72% percentile
025507510071.9% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.2%16.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.0%15.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos