Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Civics results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.9% saturation with 3,321 hits. Analysis detected 12,286 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,525 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Civics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Civics
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Civics (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,525
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 34.9%34.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.9%12.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 21.9%21.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 34.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 21.9%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Straw Man: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos