Keyword summary
65% 1 analyzed article/video 790 analyzed words
BS Summary: These City Officials results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 388 hits . Analysis detected 2,179 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,370 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (16,129 of 37,536 keywords). This City Officials is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group. City Officials
Keyword details
Total words: 2,370
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.0% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 16.4% 16.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.3% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.6% Middle Ground: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst