Keyword summary
⁠13%3 analyzed articles/videos3,131 analyzed words
BS Summary: These City Of Austin Parks And Recreation Department results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 951 hits. Analysis detected 5,621 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,524 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (36,764 of 37,536 keywords). This City Of Austin Parks And Recreation Department is better (less manipulative) than 97.90% of the peer group.
City Of Austin Parks And Recreation Department
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 12,524
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

2% percentile
02550751002.1% percentile
1.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos