Keyword summary
87% 2 analyzed articles/videos 524 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Citizens Bank results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 537 hits . Analysis detected 5,380 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,872 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (13,812 of 35,356 keywords). This Citizens Bank is worse (more manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group. Citizens Bank
Keyword details
Total words: 3,872
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.9% percentile 3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 0.8% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst