Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,220 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chuck Park results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and In-Group Bias , with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 618 hits . Analysis detected 6,348 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,880 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (13,756 of 37,536 keywords). This Chuck Park is worse (more manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group. Chuck Park
Keyword details
Total words: 4,880
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.4% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst