Keyword summary
47%3 analyzed articles/videos2,172 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Wright results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 1,174 hits. Analysis detected 10,919 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,368 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,468 of 37,533 keywords). This Chris Wright is worse (more manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group.
Chris Wright
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
59%Chris Wright (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

59% percentile
025507510058.8% percentile
3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 14.0%14.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.5%13.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate