Keyword summary
43%2 analyzed articles/videos694 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chittenden County results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 440 hits. Analysis detected 4,533 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,358 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 13% (32,918 of 37,536 keywords). This Chittenden County is better (less manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group.
Chittenden County
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
13%Chittenden County (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,358
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

12% percentile
025507510012.3% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate