Keyword summary
93% 1 analyzed article/video 377 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chinese Rocket results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 241 hits . Analysis detected 1,599 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,131 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 85% (5,810 of 37,536 keywords). This Chinese Rocket is worse (more manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group. Chinese Rocket
Keyword details
Total words: 1,131
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.5% percentile 5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 21.3% 21.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 14.5% 14.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 20.3% 20.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst