Keyword summary
29% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,519 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chinese results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 957 hits . Analysis detected 7,292 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,222 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (27,888 of 36,505 keywords). This Chinese is better (less manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group. Chinese
Keyword details
Total words: 9,222
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst