Keyword summary
96% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,484 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Tax Credit results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Indoctrination , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 650 hits . Analysis detected 6,822 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,452 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,860 of 37,536 keywords). This Child Tax Credit is worse (more manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group. Child Tax Credit
Keyword details
Total words: 4,452
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.1% percentile 4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 13.5% 13.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst