Keyword summary
70% 2 analyzed articles/videos 880 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chicago Architecture results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 662 hits . Analysis detected 4,391 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,506 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 52% (18,054 of 37,536 keywords). This Chicago Architecture is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group. Chicago Architecture
Keyword details
Total words: 5,506
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.9% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst